Approach
Existential-phenomenological psychotherapy. Seattle, Washington.
There's a moment in a lot of therapies where the client says something true, and the therapist redirects.
It's not malice. It's training. Somebody says I feel like none of this matters, and the therapist hears a symptom, offers a skill, returns to the plan. The thing the person actually came in carrying gets handed back wrapped in a coping strategy. I've watched people spend years inside that loop. Years of good-faith therapy that never quite touches what they walked in with.
I try not to redirect.
That's most of what I mean when I call my work existential-phenomenological. The word existential gets used so loosely now — existential dread about deadlines, existential threats in headlines — that it's worth saying what the philosophers I read in graduate school were actually after. Heidegger and Levinas were trying to describe the conditions of being a person that we mostly arrange our lives to avoid noticing. That we will die. That no one else can do our living for us. That meaning isn't issued at birth. Anxiety, before it shows up as a symptom, is often what happens when the cover stories we've been running on stop working.
When a client touches one of those conditions in session, I don't try to get us back to the treatment plan. That is the treatment plan.
Phenomenology is the other half. It's a fancy word for a fairly simple discipline: attend to what's actually showing up before you translate it into a category you already had ready. Someone tells me, I felt like I was nothing, and it wasn't scary. The fast moves are to call that dissociation or a mystical opening. Both moves are available. Both might be partly right. But naming it that quickly takes it away from the person who hasn't yet found their own words. They'll nod. They'll also lose the experience.
I named my practice Epoché after Husserl's word for the suspension that lets something appear on its own terms. Set down what you assumed. Wait.
In the room this looks less mysterious than it sounds. It mostly means I work slowly, and I don't fill silence to make either of us less uncomfortable. The silence after someone touches something is usually where the next true thing comes from. I take the body seriously, which is why I trained in modalities — EMDR, Brainspotting, ketamine-assisted psychotherapy — that work through felt sense rather than only through talk. The mind alone cannot finish certain pieces of work. The body has to be in on it.
None of this makes me skeptical of technique. I'm EMDRIA Certified and a Consultant-in-Training, trained in Brainspotting through Phase 2, in Flash, and Fluence-certified in KAP. I use ACT when ACT is what the moment is asking for. I learned these because they work, and because the alternative — leaving people alone with experiences their nervous system can't metabolize on its own — isn't actually kinder. My orientation tells me when to reach for a tool, how to hold it once I have, and when to put it down. EMDR runs cleaner when I'm attending to the person and not just the protocol. KAP, with medicine in the room, depends on whether I can hold an opening without inflating it.
Some honest things about fit. If you're arriving in acute crisis, we'll start with stabilization — the slower phenomenological work is what we move toward once the ground is steadier, not where we begin. Slowness is a discipline, and it asks something of both of us. What I offer is a particular kind of attention, and a particular kind of ethics about what I do with what you bring. For people who sense that more is at stake in their suffering than a symptom inventory can hold, this tends to be the right shape.
If you want this in a poem, see Apologia.